I present a few around three studies in which i examined grammatical sex consequences into the Gloss

From inside the Test step 1 (based on the look paradigm because of the matchocean abonelik iptali Vigliocco ainsi que al., 2005) i used an effective categorization activity, where people have been expected to choose a few conditions out-of good triad, based on the very first relationship regarding their resemblance. The mark were to have a look at whether or not around such as for instance conditions grammatical gender outcomes would be expose to have conceptual conditions, names out-of dogs and you may inanimate things. Within the Experiment dos, in line with the Implicit Relationship Shot (IAT) paradigm, users performed an excellent semantic categorization activity less than significant day pressure. Objective would be to glance at whether grammatical sex is actually implicitly obtainable when performing a task one to operates on lexical and you may semantic peak. In the Studies 3, i looked at the newest attribution away from men and women sounds so you’re able to animals and you may inanimate stuff, shown both because terms and conditions otherwise images, to be certain that whether or not the dictate of grammatical sex goes not in the lexical and you may semantic membership and you may to the artwork representations, and you can actually researching their effects to have spoken and you can graphic stimulus.

I believed your acquired results enable me to test this new presumptions of one’s sex and gender hypothesis and also the similarity and you may intercourse theory relating to the new Shine words

In accordance with the gender and you may intercourse theory, grammatical intercourse consequences are required to be healthier inside languages with a high structure amongst the grammatical gender from nouns in addition to physiological gender of the referents. In Polish, that it texture is limited by the proven fact that you can find three genders about only one means (masculine, female, neutral) and two sexes throughout the plural form (masculine-private and you can low-masculine-personal), that have a bit an elaborate reference to the only one alternatives. Grammatical gender from nouns may vary anywhere between the only 1 and you may plural models – the low-masculine-private plural function border every one function nouns except for male nouns speaking about anybody. Like, ‘10 pies’ (a dog) that is male in only 1 mode, will get ‘te psy’ (dogs), which is low-masculine-personal inside the plural, however, ‘ten kowal’ (a beneficial blacksmith, masculine singular) gets ‘ci kowale’ (blacksmiths, masculine-individual plural). A quicker restricted types of the brand new intercourse and you will gender hypothesis carry out assume around to-be grammatical sex effects only for nouns referring so you can pets and you will humans – that have a physical intercourse. On the about three tests displayed within report, i included nouns making reference to dogs (Try out 1 and you can step 3), inanimate stuff (most of the tests) and you can conceptual details (Try out 1).

Various other basis strongly related to the brand new gender and sex/resemblance and sex hypotheses is that the Gloss vocabulary spends a good wide selection of sex matical gender strongly related of a lot parts of address, not only to nouns. Grammatical intercourse should be thought while using verbs, numerals, adjectives, pronouns, etcetera. And the resemblance and you may sex theory perform expect one to grammatical sex effects be present in every brand new shown tests, using both animate and inanimate nouns. Watching grammatical intercourse effects to have nouns speaing frankly about objects which do n’t have a biological sex would offer solid help to the resemblance and you may gender theory.

New tight types of the newest intercourse and you may sex theory create ergo assume insufficient grammatical sex consequences when you look at the Shine, maybe not unlike of a lot typed education german born

The fresh exhibited look and will test several much more specific lookup inquiries. Experiment dos uses a changed implicit organization try to investigate if or not grammatical sex outcomes when you look at the Gloss exist towards the lexicosemantic top, and not just with the abstract height. Check out step three uses a strategy which involves attributing masculine/women sounds so you’re able to things from inside the a transferring flick) to test if or not grammatical intercourse consequences can be found with the an abstract peak. If in case talking about lexicosemantic and conceptual amounts of operating, i use the distinction as in Vigliocco et al. (2005, p. 510): this new lexicosemantic height corresponds to the fresh new definitions regarding terms and their linguistic handling (fitted on the categories, retrieving and ultizing lexical suggestions, etc.) without having to do intellectual representations of the words’ referents. Having said that, the new abstract top is dependant on the fresh new mental representations of your own referents and their services, that is non-linguistic in general. Having fun with vocabulary versus making reference to intellectual representations of stuff is precisely lexicosemantic, if you are control rational representations without the need for vocabulary is strictly abstract.