Regarding dimensions out-of intimate jealousy, in the forty mind-report products was basically advertised given that creation of the latest Mind-Report and you may Projective Jealousy Scales (Bringle, Roach, Andler, & Evenbeck, 1979). Of several instruments were used only once. , 1992) intended to determine intercourse differences; the newest Multidimensional Envy Level (Pfeiffer & Wong, 1989) developed to gauge the around three size of jealousy (intellectual, mental and behavioural size); the fresh Fb Envy Size (Muise, Christofides, & Des) intended for researching the possibilities of an event which causes attitude from envy members connected with their activity to your Myspace; the fresh Jealousy Level (Buunk, 1997), always have a look at about three kind of envy (reactive, stressed and you can preventive) together with Social Jealousy Size (IJS; Mathes, & Severa 1981), and that evaluates this new bad emotion because of real otherwise threatened loss off a liked person to an opponent.
Within the Brazil, brand new Intimate Jealousy Collection is actually modified (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) For Colombia, there are no psychometric knowledge of a specific measure on intimate jealousy
Throughout the Latin american framework, there’s a variation from inside the Chile of your own List from Practices of the Couple That cause Envy (Fernandez, Pavez, & Dufey, 2014). During the Mexico, an excellent Multidimensional Way of measuring Jealousy (Diaz-Loving, Rivera, & Flores, 1989) could have been elaborated and you will a primary research is done with the latest Multidimensional Directory from Close Jealousy (Mota, Gonzalez-Arratia, Valdez, Gonzalez, & Hernandez, 2016). At exactly the same time, previous degree don’t do Factorial Confirmatory Investigation (CFA) in order to validate the fresh basis construction located, and Benaughty you can lowest reliability accounts had been found in its issues (Bueno & Carvalho, 2012) or short samples were utilized (Mota et al., 2016).
The newest IJS create for Mathes and you can Severa (1981) is one of the most utilized bills having comparing intimate jealousy, it receive six items that evaluate the susceptibility to help you dangers associated to: (a) Partner’s unfaithfulness and you can matchmaking other people (circumstances step 1, step 3, several, fourteen, 15, sixteen, 20, 22, 23, and twenty-five); (b) Partner’s popularity (items 2, 3, cuatro, seven, 10, thirteen, 17, 20, and 23); (c) An enthusiastic untrustworthy lover (circumstances step 1, 4, 6, 19, and you may 21); (d) Partner’s old schedules (affairs eleven, twenty four, twenty-six, 27, and you will 28); (e) Partner’s apathy (things 8, nine and you may twenty-four); and you will (f) Lover’s remaining household members with dated dates and you can sex variations (issues 5 and 18).
Every tool listed above have shown sufficient degrees of validity and you can reliability
There are four degree with checked out when it comes to their reliability and you will validity. Mathes and you can Severa (1981) expose a couple knowledge, plus the first study performed the building of the size with 39 situations, which was less in order to twenty eight factors after mathematical study. Then, for the one minute investigation, IJS was applied next to most other bills that evaluated intimate like-website links, low self-esteem, self-admiration and a random survey out of independent identities, verifying, predicated on principle, that the expert from jealousy, the greater the amount of Romantic love in addition to decreased the brand new separate term of your couple. Within this data, i statement an effective coefficient off precision out of .ninety-five to the total level. For the a 3rd data, Mathes, Phillips, Skowran and you can Manhood (1982), so you can continue new evidence regarding authenticity, utilized the IJS and two behavioral strategies: (a) danger whenever met with a competitor and you will (b) expressions off possessiveness into the spouse, as a result of a call which they designed to the one who participated in the research. The fresh new questioned correlations was basically gotten, and this once more supported the fresh new validity of the measure. Finally, for the a 4th study, Mathes, Roter and you can Joerger (1982) corroborated brand new convergent legitimacy away from IJS with other scales one examined romantic jealousy.
Recent Comments